The following dialogue is based on a real discussion in the form of philosophy: his truth and reality:
Niki: Dear Mulmi, you use the term 'being', sometimes on a very strange way.
So you ask, for example, every now and then, in discussions, or in one of your texts, 'What is His love?', 'What is the being of the area?', 'What is the being of time? " - And now you ask me what, in my opinion, this could be his philosophy ...
However, if you are using the term 'being' on such an unusual way, you should always be clear to you that you that what you ask, and you call being, vergegenst & # 228; flammable, and elevate it to something essentiality, something quasi-animate!
Mulmi: To be honest, I do not quite understand what you mean!
In general, German-language usage, the term 'being', in the majority and not so used and understood that something that is referred to as being, necessarily, something which has existence MUST, which is animated or alive!
If someone, for example, the question is whether the wonderful Landscape from which he has dreamed last night that his or apparent, may not, alone, due to the position on this issue, necessarily and accurate way be concluded that the questioner the landscape, after the he asks, as seen (a) nature.
alone, namely the question of whether something (a) His or is (a) sham, still contains no information as to whether that is asked what is a being, or whether it may the questioner is estimated to be something which has existence.
In general, German-language use, the question of whether something is being or appearance, usually so interpreted, that, by this question, basically, is to be found He asked whether the 'only' in the form of a document (eg as a dream or as a perceptual illusion) exists, or whether it rather has also an existence beyond appearances. hot
should be: If I only
and ask only to whether the scissors, etc., the hat, the scenery, etc., of which I have dreamed to be or is apparent, are probably the most German speaking people to understand my question so that I want to know whether the health of me and Dreamed 'only' exist in my subjective dream-world, or even beyond, in my dream a reality, (a ) has existence.
The term 'being' is therefore in the question of whether something is equated to be or appear, in general, German-language, with the words 'Real-life' or 'Real-reality'.
being (for the matter of his or sham) = Real-life = Real-reality
And similarly, it is with the question of TO BE OR NOT TO BE!
point I alleiniglich the question in the space, whether to be or not-being, so my question is, according to the German-language general-use by many as either a question of life or death, or , according as a question of existence or non-existence or reality or non-reality to be understood.
And this means that, in the question of existence or non-being, in general, German-language usage, the term 'being' to EITHER the term 'life' or with the term 'existence' or 'reality' are identified and is equated.
being (in the question of existence or non-existence) = life
OR:
being (in the question of existence or non-existence) = existence or reality
These two examples (of being and appearance, and of being or non-existence), shows not only that the term 'being', in general, German-language, who do not automatically understand the content and meaning in nature is must.
They show, in my opinion, further to that basic meaning, the term 'being', in general, German-language, currently belongs.
FACT: In general, German-language usage, the term 'being', regularly, as a form of existence or reality or existence or reality in the general sense, understood and used.
And since I am in my use key philosophical concepts - they are not purely technical nature - always at their fundamental importance in general parlance, the appropriate time, indicative, it can therefore only a misunderstanding persons, where the impression I, on the question 'What is philosophy of being? ", the term' being 'in such use and understand, that it something which has existence in the sense of a living or anything animated, carries in itself.
So much to do so.
course, I had the question 'What is the being of philosophy? " also can make different.
I might as well have the word 'be' factor out of the question and instead to 'just' ask 'What is philosophy? ".
If I had simply asked, 'What is Philosophy?', The question would, presumably, to any interpretative Misunderstanding out, and they would have been understandable ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment